-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday, 2013-10-20 at 16:11 +0200, Per Jessen wrote:
Carlos E. R. wrote:
Why would that be? What is the recommendation? FAT? That was one of the installation choices. Is FAT better than reiserfs?
The recommendation is probably ext4 (the default).
It doesn't make much sense that you can format during install as FAT but not Reiserfs.
Dunno, JFS went out a couple of years ago and that is still actively maintained.
Yes, but my meaning was different. You can not install on FAT a Linux system, however it is available as filesystem during install. Why is FAT available and not reiserfs? It makes no sense to me. Some one could try to install on it... - -- Cheers, Carlos E. R. (from 12.3 x86_64 "Dartmouth" at Telcontar) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlJj67YACgkQtTMYHG2NR9UZJwCgjARxa3CCtVCc5jV1YTqBeq6p oQsAnjvnLDc2aYZnnKck5ihYIfw+rz7P =NaxE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org