-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Content-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.00.0904200415200.5164@nimrodel.valinor> On Saturday, 2009-04-18 at 11:00 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
Le vendredi 17 avril 2009, à 00:56 +0200, Carlos E. R. a écrit :
On Thursday, 2009-04-16 at 21:09 +0200, Stephan Kulow wrote:
On Thursday 16 April 2009 15:36:41 Carlos E. R. wrote:
Wish? Specialized CD images... ;-) Why does anyone make this a "what I always wanted to say about CDs" thread?
You asked what we would like on the cd... O:-)
You forgot the context... Stephan pointed out we have a bit more space on livecd now, so he proposed specific things we could add to the current livecd. He didn't ask "what kind of livecd should we have?"
(not saying your idea is bad -- it's just off-topic for the original question)
Ok, but I also answered the original question, what to add on that space on the CD. ...
Other distributions are making their livecd the primary way for installation, so there'll be users who think it's the same for openSUSE.
(again, not saying beagle should be on the livecd, just disagreeing with your argument; my argument is that languages are more important than beagle)
And mine too. Perhaps you two missed that part of my reply, I'll copy it here: ] For the standard CD, I'd vote for languages first, then perhaps java and ] flash for full browsing. Beagle certainly not (what for? it is a R/O ] filesystem) Does this clarify my reply? I recogn I sidetracked a bit with the suggestion of also adding specialised CDs, as a rescue one (a suggestion someone else also did), but I also replied the specific question of what to add :-) - -- Cheers, Carlos E. R. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAknr25kACgkQtTMYHG2NR9Wh5QCfVqjQa4wwP+lNe4ePcmnFHGf5 8R0An1CgwXS1r6Gr21KepcP2RDvBlhqf =SZcv -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----