Jiri Slaby wrote:
On 17. 11. 20, 14:55, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
With that, I find it prospective to just keep emptying /sbin and in doing so, drop the #UsrMerge blocks from specfiles, without going to %usrmerged, but straight to "done".
As a start, what about a post build check like we have for uses of /usr/bin/env after shebang? This would eliminate a lot, esp. for /bin/bash IMO.
To nag at packagers to patch all script to use /usr/bin/bash? That would be over the top IMO. It isn't wrong to use /bin/sh in shell scripts. That's kind of ABI IMO. We can't change /lib/ld-linux.so.2 hardcoded in binaries either after all. That's why the effort needs to be called usr merge rather than usr move :-) After the merge using either location works as it's the same. cu Ludwig -- (o_ Ludwig Nussel //\ V_/_ http://www.suse.com/ SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg)