Does this mean that IBM will enforce that /usr and other useful partitions will be only avaiable by using initramfs?
WHY? You don't need /usr on a separate partition anymore.
I'm aware that a separate /usr is only optional. Personal I do not use a separate /usr partition. Nevertheless I know customers using such /usr partition to minimize downtime due e.g. file system problems.
Wouldn't it be better to fix the real problem instead?
I understand what you are saying, and why, but having choices is a big deal in the *ix world and I don't like all the suggestions that thoose having a /usr partition are wrong. Isn't it up to them? // Roger -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org