2011/11/14 Cristian Morales Vega
On 14 November 2011 12:35, Nelson Marques
wrote: My apologies to you, Cristian and everyone else who might have felt offended, it wasn't my intention. Lots of stuff just pilled up until everything blown up. Really, I've said 100 times I was leaving... and I'm still here...
I don't think any of us got offended.
For your information, those packages have been updated, and dependencies that needed to be updated, I've always did it and shared with the rest of the world. Like I said previously scons is one example. My work on Banshee repository made it possible that 12.1 and oS:Factory have fully updated mono stack (thanks to Stephen Shaw) amongst other things...
If you or anyone else thinks that I have to loose anything, you're wrong... I'm not on no one's payroll, i take nothing from this except the joy of seeing things happening and feeling useful. In fact, moving away makes me earn more free time and less trouble for my head. So really... keep placing barriers for people. I can't speak for the others, but only for myself... since when has any of the packages I maintain become orphaned ?
If what i've done so far isn't worth any credit at all? Haven't I replied always to people who asked me for help or pointed me that something was being done wrong?
Had Coolo proposed to submit guichan to Factory I would have said exactly the same. I said guichan looks dead because... well, it looks dead to me. As simple as that. I didn't say you can't submit it to Factory (I don't have any veto power here) and the final word about the concerns I raised is in the security team.
But the further I look the more dead it looks -> http://wiki.unknown-horizons.org/w/Ideas_2011/FIFE_Pychan. It's from FIFE developers, from this year, and it says guichan is dead ("no longer being actively developed"). Anyway it's good to know they are working to get rid of it (http://fife.trac.cvsdude.com/engine/ticket/549).
Cristian, I dont' want to offend anyone, but I think this is pathetic. Fedora has the most brutal packaging demands in the world, and it checked and cleared without much issues (aside from the bundled fonts and binary blob from python-enet). Here... which I believed to be far more liberal (though controlled), there always issues which make really no sense, for them to make sense, every package in the same condition should be booted off from oS:Factory... the question is, why haven't they ? :) I suppose that's some kind of pre-emptitive strike for a better future... hopefully not mine... Now what was a clean release has turned into a nightmare on games:unknown-horizons due to the changes I'm forced to introduce... like someone once told me... "if it breaks, it can be fixed". Lets not waste more time around this topic, it's your playground, I don't think I don't want to play here anymore. Call me a emo, a cry baby, a prima dona, whatever, I don't care... My time is worth far more than this. NM
I think this is all the information we NEEDED. Now if someone wants to push it to Factory we have the facts and we can decide. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org