On 10/20/2013 07:50 AM, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Sunday 2013-10-20 16:41, Carlos E. R. wrote:
Yes, but my meaning was different. You can not install on FAT a Linux system, however it is available as filesystem during install. Why is FAT available and not reiserfs? It makes no sense to me. Some one could try to install on it... To put /boot on FAT. Makes sense? Yes. (The two symlinks in /boot can be practically ignored, they do not seem to be used.)
What would the usage case for /boot on FAT be? Would MS Windows ever be interested in looking at /boot? How about installing / on a FAT partition? It would seem that the installer would allow it since it's one of the suggestions. (I didn't try it!) Regards, Lew -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org