On 11.08.2016 17:32, Todd Rme wrote:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 5:41 AM, Stephan Kulow
wrote: On 11.08.2016 11:27, Víctor Cuadrado Juan wrote:
Hi everyone!
I would love to gather some ideas and consensus on this, and ideally, get a policy on how update-alternatives should be used, and have an rpmlint check written/improved so we can start filling bugs per package.
There is a policy and a rpmlint check for it - so either you report bugs or fix the packages. There are 61 packages atm hitting this error in Factory.
E.g. https://api.opensuse.org/public/build/openSUSE:Factory/standard/x86_64/ctags...
Greetings, Stephan
Where is the policy documented? I can't find it. There is an rpmlint warning, but it is unclear from the warning how to fix it, since the packages seem to be doing what the warning requests.
Perhaps it might be helpful to pick an example package that is violating the policy and explain exactly what needs to be changed to make it complaint.
The whole update-alternatives system is pretty cryptic and almost totally undocumented in the openSUSE wiki from what I have been able to find.
See https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Packaging_Multiple_Version_guidelines Greetings, Stephan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org