On 12/10/2009 12:13 PM, Rob OpenSuSE wrote:
2009/12/10 Vincent Untz
: Le jeudi 10 décembre 2009, à 11:05 +0100, Andreas Jaeger a écrit :
I see some consensus for this, so what tag should be used in the subject to mark it? Let's reword the proposal to work with missing details...
I suggest RFC for the tag. That's what some people already use, and it makes sense.
But RFC is useful for getting comments on new designs for example.
These annoucements are more about breakage, or incompatible changes, and less opening discussion.
I guess they can be used also for non-breaking info, can't they? :O) Impornat things (TM) :O)
A different tag would seem useful for that.
Maybe "BRK" or something?
Rob
-- cheers, jano Ján Kupec YaST team ---------------------------------------------------------(PGP)--- Key ID: 637EE901 Fingerprint: 93B9 C79B 2D20 51C3 800B E09B 8048 46A6 637E E901 ---------------------------------------------------------(IRC)--- Server: irc.freenode.net Nick: jniq Channels: #zypp #yast #suse #susecz ---------------------------------------------------------(EOF)---