On Wed, 2016-02-10 at 12:58 +0100, Dominique Leuenberger / DimStar wrote:
On Wed, 2016-02-10 at 12:17 +0100, Yamaban wrote:
* Niggles, like: "Wah! Use SUSE special macros only!" do NOT apply. No special SUSE only stuff, valid package means: valid (rpm)build, valid test (build, install, run, uninstall)
References please - As an active member of the review team I am pretty sure that having build conditions for other distros in the package are no decline reason. Just as special conditions to build differently on PM for example are no decline reason. For arguments sake: check out libzypp.spec: it is filled with fedora_version. Squid also has checks for fedora_version.
As we all like hard facts, I did the following in a openSUSE:Factory checkout (all packages): find -maxdepth 2 -name '*.spec' -exec grep -l "?fedora" {} \; | wc -l Turns out we currently have 117 spec files that contain the string "?fedora" which is most commonly used in %{?fedora_version}. So, there is really no reason why one would not be allowed to submit .spec files with non-openSUSE specific parts in it (but please: try to keep the .spec files readable - the Review team favors readable diffs) Cheers, Dominique -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org