On Thursday 30 September 2010 13:47:13 Satoru Matsumoto wrote:
Satoru Matsumoto wrote:
Even if I have the right to change the status of features, I won't be able to move into action, if above things are not clear. And I think those procedure should be shared by each members of screening team (and probably each team leads) first.
Well, I've curiously flowcharted the procedure to clarify the flow.
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/568187/openSUSE/openFATE/feature_handling_flow.o dg
Is this the same as you have in your mind? If not, please correct the flowchart.
I hope this will help our understanding and further discussions.
Thanks, great idea! I've also updated the wiki page with more information. I would just rename the state "Eval by team lead" to "marketplace" and as such have changed the graph. Does this make sense now? Btw. I'm open to any other ideas on how to do this, my goal is to get something working easily ;) Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, Program Manager openSUSE, aj@{novell.com,opensuse.org} Twitter: jaegerandi | Identica: jaegerandi SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126