On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 11:21:21AM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
On Nov 30 2016, Michael Schroeder
wrote: On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 11:05:21AM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
On Nov 30 2016, Michael Schroeder
wrote: systemd-32bit already contains a packageand(systemd:pam-32bit),
What do you mean with "contains"?
It was supposed to read "Supplements: packageand(systemd:pam-32bit)"
$ rpm -q --supplements systemd-32bit packageand(systemd:pam-32bit)
How is that relevant?
So you think the recommends systemd-32bit in the pattern is correct and all other pam packages that use a supplements are broken? M. -- Michael Schroeder mls@suse.de SUSE LINUX GmbH, GF Jeff Hawn, HRB 16746 AG Nuernberg main(_){while(_=~getchar())putchar(~_-1/(~(_|32)/13*2-11)*13);} -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org