Am Dienstag, den 09.01.2018, 10:06 +0100 schrieb Richard Biener:
On Tue, 9 Jan 2018, Dominique Leuenberger / DimStar wrote:
On Tue, 2018-01-09 at 08:41 +0000, Rainer Klier wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 09.01.2018, 09:28 +0100 schrieb Dominique Leuenberger / DimStar:
Urgh - so in order to fix an already polluted system you pollute it more... as the maintainer of GNOME:Factory, I can only say: there should be really no reason at all to add G:F to any machine that is not doing actual devel work on the GNOME packages. Upgrades from G:F moved to TW at a high enough pace - once things are tested on the developers machines. But of course, you are 'free' to do as you wish.
The real issue is of course false binary compatibility promises made via not changing the SONAME or using symbol versioning...
exactly.
Of course it's quite hard to do right, especially with C++, but still I'd expect "core" libraries to do better here...
i totally agree. -- Best Regards | Freundliche Grüße | Cordialement | Cordiali Saluti | Atenciosamente | Saludos Cordiales DI Rainer Klier Research & Development, DevOps _________________________________________________________ Namirial GmbH