23 Mar
2012
23 Mar
'12
04:07
On Friday 23 March 2012 06:35:28 Cristian Rodríguez wrote:
Unfortunately, those nice arguments do not match reality.
- KDE 3 is abandonware. - It can (is/will) stop building at any time. - It uses a large amount of build resources.
KDE3 inside Factory consumes much less resources than KDE:KDE3 project because all building power is shared between all projects. And KDE:KDE3 is indeed rated rather high in priority by an automatic script because it is very popular.
- No, the "trinity desktop" that has two developers cannot sustain such a large effort for a long time. it is economically unsustainable. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org