On Tuesday, November 29, 2011 10:48 AM, "Stephan Kulow" <coolo@suse.de> wrote:
On 28.11.2011 22:29, jdd wrote:
Le 28/11/2011 20:47, Lars Müller a écrit :
Of course you're. Samba doesn't care about openSUSE schedules (very much). As kernel.org doesn't, as Apache doesn't.
It's not the tail which wags the dog. ;)
and?
do you think the last version is always the better?
How else do you interpret the regular "can we shift back for KDE X.Y.Z?" thread or the general hype around tumbleweed?
And "testing time" is only an argument if you have developers fixing things. We mostly have packagers who reply "that bug is possibly fixed in latest version".
I'm new to trying to help out by testing, but from my impressions this comment is spot on. All the bugs I reported in the 12.1 beta/RC phases seemed to be fixed in the 'next version', usually the version that came with the next RC. My impression is that there are very few people in the Opensuse project working on writing code to fix bugs in packages, the bulk of the work making packages and updating packages. This makes perfect sense, Opensuse is a distribution so its main work is packaging the results of upstream projects where the coding work is done. So if anything I'd say relax the version freeze times a little bit, let the newest stuff we can into each release (within reason and without reducing testing time down to nothing of course). Tim -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org