On 11.08.2016 14:06, Víctor Cuadrado Juan wrote:
On 08/11/2016 11:41 AM, Stephan Kulow wrote:
There is a policy and a rpmlint check for it
Seems the policy is lacking as it is (I point to the mix of symlinks owned and not owned by packages). If you feel like it isn't, please share why you think so and if you think the current state of the symlinks is desirable (that's why I wrote this e-mail :).
No, just some package just don't follow it.
- so either you report bugs or fix the packages.
I don't think that starting a mass bug filling for something that hasn't been discussed yet is a solution.
Aehm, so you want to discuss if those packages not following the policy and have a warning in their rpmlint.log are correct? I don't see why.
I get your point, if you want something to be done, do it yourself. Doing that without consensus or a talk is a recipe for disaster.
There are 61 packages atm hitting this error in Factory.
E.g. https://api.opensuse.org/public/build/openSUSE:Factory/standard/x86_64/ctags...
Honest question, how did you obtain that information? Do we have infrastructure to see failing rpmlint checks by package? (apart from using a script that you need to remember to run?).
You just replace the package name in the above URL. And your mail already mentioned that ctags is buggy. Greetings, Stephan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org