![](https://seccdn.libravatar.org/avatar/757205097a14d69edc12951b3375437b.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@inai.de> writes:
On Thursday 2022-08-11 10:33, Dan Čermák wrote:
How hard could it be? glibc has been built as glibc and glibc.i686 for a long time (and now it's _multibuilded, but still doing the same).
The problem is that i686 and x86_64 are distinct architectures for rpm. x86_64v2 and x86_64v3 are not
rpm should have configuration directives for what's distinct and what isn't.
Yes it should, but architecture handling in rpm is at the moment kind of a mess and should be reworked. I've started a discussion about this specific topic on github: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/discussions/2140 Let's see where that goes. Cheers, Dan -- Dan Čermák <dcermak@suse.com> Software Engineer Development tools SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH Frankenstrasse 146 90461 Nürnberg Germany (HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg) Managing Director/Geschäftsführer: Ivo Totev, Andrew Myers, Andrew McDonald, Boudien Moerman