Hi, last month's status: https://lists.opensuse.org/archives/list/factory@lists.opensuse.org/thread/I... Last months' reproducible builds project updates (including my work): https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2021-05/ This month we improved reproducibility of our kernel packages via https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187167 though I still need to test the fix for the embedded random signing key. Most of the bugreports and fixes I did this month are about being able to build in the year 2036 and with -j1 https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1185637 could still use some love in that area. I tried to extend the certs, but for some reason this did not make tests pass. Additionally, I pushed several fixes towards 15.3 I uploaded https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20210630/ today and rbstats are: total-packages: 14082 (+56) build-tried: 14053 (+64) build-failed: 33 (-25) build-n-a: 163 (-1) build-succeeded: 13857 (+90) build-official-failed+na: 248 (-150) build-compare-failed: 359 (-6) build-compare-succeeded: 13498 (+96) verify-failed: 475 (+7) verified-semi-reproducible: 13079 (+491) bit-by-bit-identical: 13206 (+80) not-bit-by-bit-identical: 640 (-1) https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20210630/graph.png shows the change over time https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20210630/unreproduciblerings.txt lists very unreproducible core packages (bootstrap+DVD) Of the badly unreproducible packages, 3 were in ring0 41 were in ring1 That makes it 44/3247 => 1.36 % which is below the overall average of 359/13857 => 2.59 % 640/13857 => 4.62 % of packages are not perfectly reproducible Ciao Bernhard M.