2012/6/17 Carlos E. R. <robin.listas@telefonica.net>:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 2012-06-17 14:23, Dominique Leuenberger wrote:
On Sun, 2012-06-17 at 14:19 +0200, Dominique Leuenberger wrote:
On Sun, 2012-06-17 at 16:14 +0400, Ilya Chernykh wrote:
What is the replacement?
Use BuildRequires: pkgconfig(libxine) and you don't ever have to worry how the maintainer renames his rpm packages.
saves you a lot of trouble.
Alternatively, the correct name would be libxine-devel.
libxine1 is the shared library name as per SLPP.. no reason to rename the devel package when there is an ABI bump (I guess at one point the maintainer of xine-lib saw that too and changed the name to libxine-devel)
Actually, there is libxine1 and libxine2. As most users replace the openSUSE version with the packman version, we should use the same naming convention they use, or things may break.
Hi, If I'm not wrong, the mantainer of openSUSE and Pacman version is the same. He update the version of xine (another efect was the inclusion of libavutil). In that thread is pointed to a bugzilla number: https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=762784 regards, Luiz -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org