[opensuse-factory] nothing provides libxine1-devel
What is the replacement? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On Sun, 2012-06-17 at 16:14 +0400, Ilya Chernykh wrote:
What is the replacement?
Use BuildRequires: pkgconfig(libxine) and you don't ever have to worry how the maintainer renames his rpm packages. saves you a lot of trouble. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On Sun, 2012-06-17 at 14:19 +0200, Dominique Leuenberger wrote:
On Sun, 2012-06-17 at 16:14 +0400, Ilya Chernykh wrote:
What is the replacement?
Use BuildRequires: pkgconfig(libxine) and you don't ever have to worry how the maintainer renames his rpm packages.
saves you a lot of trouble.
Alternatively, the correct name would be libxine-devel. libxine1 is the shared library name as per SLPP.. no reason to rename the devel package when there is an ABI bump (I guess at one point the maintainer of xine-lib saw that too and changed the name to libxine-devel) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-06-17 14:23, Dominique Leuenberger wrote:
On Sun, 2012-06-17 at 14:19 +0200, Dominique Leuenberger wrote:
On Sun, 2012-06-17 at 16:14 +0400, Ilya Chernykh wrote:
What is the replacement?
Use BuildRequires: pkgconfig(libxine) and you don't ever have to worry how the maintainer renames his rpm packages.
saves you a lot of trouble.
Alternatively, the correct name would be libxine-devel.
libxine1 is the shared library name as per SLPP.. no reason to rename the devel package when there is an ABI bump (I guess at one point the maintainer of xine-lib saw that too and changed the name to libxine-devel)
Actually, there is libxine1 and libxine2. As most users replace the openSUSE version with the packman version, we should use the same naming convention they use, or things may break. - -- Cheers / Saludos, Carlos E. R. (from 11.4 x86_64 "Celadon" at Telcontar) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk/d3WcACgkQIvFNjefEBxoO1gCdFrC+jEx02wMsj9T1k8PrPPPQ NMoAn08/PCX3iVEwZ06HH5Pdjt2L+Q2f =f1NL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
2012/6/17 Carlos E. R.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 2012-06-17 14:23, Dominique Leuenberger wrote:
On Sun, 2012-06-17 at 14:19 +0200, Dominique Leuenberger wrote:
On Sun, 2012-06-17 at 16:14 +0400, Ilya Chernykh wrote:
What is the replacement?
Use BuildRequires: pkgconfig(libxine) and you don't ever have to worry how the maintainer renames his rpm packages.
saves you a lot of trouble.
Alternatively, the correct name would be libxine-devel.
libxine1 is the shared library name as per SLPP.. no reason to rename the devel package when there is an ABI bump (I guess at one point the maintainer of xine-lib saw that too and changed the name to libxine-devel)
Actually, there is libxine1 and libxine2. As most users replace the openSUSE version with the packman version, we should use the same naming convention they use, or things may break.
Hi, If I'm not wrong, the mantainer of openSUSE and Pacman version is the same. He update the version of xine (another efect was the inclusion of libavutil). In that thread is pointed to a bugzilla number: https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=762784 regards, Luiz -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-06-17 15:50, Luiz Fernando Ranghetti wrote:
If I'm not wrong, the mantainer of openSUSE and Pacman version is the same. He update the version of xine (another efect was the inclusion of libavutil). In that thread is pointed to a bugzilla number:
Complicated... - -- Cheers / Saludos, Carlos E. R. (from 11.4 x86_64 "Celadon" at Telcontar) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk/d5BAACgkQIvFNjefEBxoPWACeO8jb+A1wKkRR/3tiwFfvyhff ZQAAoJEFlMtKYRkovaG7JjzK2WcNfLTU =EZiE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
On Sunday 17 Jun 2012 15:36:39 Carlos E. R. wrote:
As most users replace the openSUSE version with the packman version, we should use the same naming convention they use, or things may break.
I've stopped doing this after the discussions whose end result was that gstreamer would become the default phonon backend instead of xine. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
2012/6/17 Graham Anderson
On Sunday 17 Jun 2012 15:36:39 Carlos E. R. wrote:
As most users replace the openSUSE version with the packman version, we should use the same naming convention they use, or things may break.
I've stopped doing this after the discussions whose end result was that gstreamer would become the default phonon backend instead of xine.
Looks like someone has a working brain somewhere :) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
participants (6)
-
Carlos E. R. -
Dominique Leuenberger -
Graham Anderson -
Ilya Chernykh -
Luiz Fernando Ranghetti -
Nelson Marques