On Tuesday 27 January 2004 19:10, Thomas Adam wrote:
Galeon is far too over-loated, relying on the core set of GNOME libs to get the damn thing going. Mozilla-firebird is quite good, I would go with that.
I haven't tried Firebird on LTSP but I suspect it may perform worse than Galeon. My experience is with Mozilla, but the reasoning is the same: For Mozilla and Firebird, the user interface uses XUL, whereas Galeon uses 'real code' (even if it is bloated). Consequently, when multiple instances of Galeon are running, all this code is shared, whereas with Mozilla and Firebird, the user interface code is interpreted separately, and stored separately in memory for each instance. This made a dramatic difference in the memory demands on the server for us . Sorry I can't remember how much, but it was an extremely significant improvement when we moved from Mozilla to Galeon. Cheers -- Phil Driscoll