Hi,
i would like to propose the following permission practices for the repository:
Factory:Contrib * Repository is owned by reviewers * Submission of new packages happens trough osc submitreq and goes trough an initial review. * Repo bugowner is opensuse-contrib@opensuse.org * Packages are owned by maintainers * Development on packages just happens, no additional review. * Package bugowner is the maintainer
<version>:Contrib * Repository is owned by reviewers * No new packages * Repo bugowner is opensuse-contrib@opensuse.org * Packages are owned by reviewers * Everything is handled by osc submitreq and goes trough an review * Package bugowner is the maintainer
Can we agree on that?
Henne
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 12:14 AM, Henne Vogelsang hvogel@opensuse.org wrote:
Hi,
i would like to propose the following permission practices for the repository:
Factory:Contrib
- Repository is owned by reviewers
- Submission of new packages happens trough osc submitreq and goes trough an initial review.
- Repo bugowner is opensuse-contrib@opensuse.org
- Packages are owned by maintainers
- Development on packages just happens, no additional review.
- Package bugowner is the maintainer
<version>:Contrib
- Repository is owned by reviewers
- No new packages
- Repo bugowner is opensuse-contrib@opensuse.org
- Packages are owned by reviewers
- Everything is handled by osc submitreq and goes trough an review
- Package bugowner is the maintainer
Can we agree on that?
Yes. In principle it is not much different from what we have already.
Which is summarized here: http://en.opensuse.org/Contrib/Adding_new_packages
Except one thing: As far as we are small - let's reduce bureaucracy and all different ways of submitting package-review requests - email list and osc, and perhaps later - bugzilla.
On Mon, 2008-12-08 at 23:14 +0100, Henne Vogelsang wrote:
Hi,
i would like to propose the following permission practices for the repository:
Factory:Contrib
- Repository is owned by reviewers
- Submission of new packages happens trough osc submitreq and goes trough an initial review.
- Repo bugowner is opensuse-contrib@opensuse.org
- Packages are owned by maintainers
- Development on packages just happens, no additional review.
- Package bugowner is the maintainer
<version>:Contrib
- Repository is owned by reviewers
- No new packages
- Repo bugowner is opensuse-contrib@opensuse.org
- Packages are owned by reviewers
- Everything is handled by osc submitreq and goes trough an review
- Package bugowner is the maintainer
Can we agree on that?
Sounds good... +1
Cheers, Magnus
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 8:59 PM, Magnus Boman captain.magnus@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 2008-12-08 at 23:14 +0100, Henne Vogelsang wrote:
Hi,
i would like to propose the following permission practices for the repository:
Factory:Contrib
- Repository is owned by reviewers
- Submission of new packages happens trough osc submitreq and goes trough an initial review.
- Repo bugowner is opensuse-contrib@opensuse.org
- Packages are owned by maintainers
- Development on packages just happens, no additional review.
- Package bugowner is the maintainer
<version>:Contrib
- Repository is owned by reviewers
- No new packages
- Repo bugowner is opensuse-contrib@opensuse.org
- Packages are owned by reviewers
- Everything is handled by osc submitreq and goes trough an review
- Package bugowner is the maintainer
Can we agree on that?
Sounds good... +1
+1 I've already tried to ask on ml and bugzilla. Right now I have an OBS Request open since 12/01, It seems to be not so quickly. Maybe osc is the best choice. -- [ ]'s Aledr - Alexandre "OpenSource Solutions for SmallBusiness Problems"
Le lundi 08 décembre 2008, à 23:14 +0100, Henne Vogelsang a écrit :
Hi,
i would like to propose the following permission practices for the repository:
Factory:Contrib
- Repository is owned by reviewers
- Submission of new packages happens trough osc submitreq and goes trough an initial review.
- Repo bugowner is opensuse-contrib@opensuse.org
- Packages are owned by maintainers
- Development on packages just happens, no additional review.
- Package bugowner is the maintainer
<version>:Contrib
- Repository is owned by reviewers
- No new packages
- Repo bugowner is opensuse-contrib@opensuse.org
- Packages are owned by reviewers
- Everything is handled by osc submitreq and goes trough an review
- Package bugowner is the maintainer
Can we agree on that?
Definitely makes sense.
This won't be an issue now, so there's no need to find a solution now, but I think it makes sense to have something like Debian NMU (non-maintainer upload) for Factory:Contrib if a maintainer isn't responsive for some time. Just something to keep in mind for when the issue will arise.
Vincent
Hello,
Am Montag, 8. Dezember 2008 schrieb Henne Vogelsang:
i would like to propose the following permission practices for the repository:
...
<version>:Contrib
- Repository is owned by reviewers
- No new packages
I basically agree on your proposal except the "no new packages" rule for <version>:Contrib. IMHO it should be allowed (after a package went through the usual review process, of course).
Why do you think we shouldn't allow new packages for released openSUSE versions in Contrib? (Maybe I overlooked some possible problem?)
Regards,
Christian Boltz
Hi,
Christian Boltz wrote:
Am Montag, 8. Dezember 2008 schrieb Henne Vogelsang:
i would like to propose the following permission practices for the repository:
...
<version>:Contrib
- Repository is owned by reviewers
- No new packages
I basically agree on your proposal except the "no new packages" rule for <version>:Contrib. IMHO it should be allowed (after a package went through the usual review process, of course).
Why do you think we shouldn't allow new packages for released openSUSE versions in Contrib? (Maybe I overlooked some possible problem?)
Because a changing repo can possible introduce new bugs you did not catch during the beta phase of contrib (which would be in parallel to factory betas). Of course you can do that but its definitely a risk.
Henne
-
aledr -
Alexey Eremenko -
Christian Boltz -
Henne Vogelsang -
Magnus Boman -
Vincent Untz