On Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 01:32:22AM +0200, Petit Eric wrote:
hum really hasardous task, not a twice time, my brain say enouth of reverse engenering lol osc was write by suse/novell, they certainly have a better doc/spec, this not public.
Not really - there is no better spec inside Novell, unfortunately. Funny thing is, and I just realize it, in fact I started out exactly like you. (Being the first author of osc.) Tried things, asked here, and so on. (Got me this far ;) The api docs are sometimes updated. It helps to ask for it. I'll also check back with my colleagues to emphasize the importance of this.
I start the project here and shear generous guy to finish to copy/pste the heavy part (all the function) :
http://sourceforge.net/projects/monoosc/ code is in the svn, the engine(basic and simple) is finish, there is also a "samlpe" to use it.
Interesting. You might want to add something to the wiki pages about it, to increase visibility. Maybe around here: http://en.opensuse.org/Build_Service#Build_Service_Clients Peter -- "WARNING: This bug is visible to non-employees. Please be respectful!" SUSE LINUX Products GmbH Research & Development