On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 05:20, Roger Oberholtzer
On Wed, 2011-10-19 at 10:58 -0800, Sascha Peilicke wrote:
On Wednesday 19 October 2011 10:38:30 Roger Oberholtzer wrote:
On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 17:12 -0800, Sascha Peilicke wrote:
We use Hudson for CI locally. Interesting to see that you use Jenkins. Perhaps this is not for discussion here, but what is the difference between the two? http://www.google.com/search?q=hudson+versus+jenkins
Thanks for that. But few of them really say anything useful. Mainly that Hudson is losing share. OK. But do any of these describe any technical reason for this? All I see is the results of a popularity contest. Of course, if all the Hudson developers move to Jenkins, that is compelling reason to follow. It remains unclear to me just why they are jumping ship.
Yours sincerely,
Roger Oberholtzer
The reason essentially for both hudson and jenkins is because oracle is really lame. The pissed off the entire core team and a large (most if not just about all) of the community. There is a whole lot of blog posts out there about this. At the end of the day oracle pushed everyone out the door and cased a fork in the project. I can't imagine other than just taking jenkins code into hudson that hudson will necessarily compete/survive with jenkins. Cheers, Stephen -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner@opensuse.org