
On Wednesday 05 March 2008 20:34:48 wrote Bernhard Walle:
* Marcus Rueckert <darix@opensu.se> [2008-03-05 19:57]:
On 2008-03-05 19:31:37 +0100, Bernhard Walle wrote:
* Dr. Peter Poeml <poeml@suse.de> [2008-03-05 16:16]:
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 10:22:06AM -0400, James Oakley wrote:
I have no code yet - because I do not know python yet. That's why I really appreciate that there actually is even more code now to learn :)
Don't learn from this code, unless you're looking for poorly documented PyQt code. :-) Qt itself isn't very pythonic, so there is a lot of Python that you won't typically see in PyQt apps.
I once wrote a graphical application, and I found wxPython most pythonic to work with... but I'm not generally to trust when it comes to graphical applications ;)
Well, wxPython is clearly an advantage if you have Windows in mind, but for Unix only applications I think that wxGtk gives the better user experience. wxWidgets applications are slow (on startup) and don't feel 100 % "native". I don't like that toolkit as user -- no matter if it's Python or C++.
1. Qt works nicely on windows/osx too.
Well, the initial claim was that PyQt is not Pytonish. And looking a bit into the manual of PyQt I agree 100 %.
James claimed that his code was not documented at that point of time. And btw, PyQt is very well evolved, very good documentated and quite often used for lots of apps, even bigger. You do not take every discussion complete off-topic just to share your personal opinions who everbody should code in your opinion ;) -- Adrian Schroeter SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) email: adrian@suse.de --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+help@opensuse.org