http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022404 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022404#c10 Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|IN_PROGRESS |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #10 from Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.com> --- (In reply to Michal Suchanek from comment #9)

...

avr-gcc-6 -c test.c ; echo $? 0

The cross-avr-gcc6 from devel:gcc does work this test case.

Also the new naming is technically more correct for the avr case so I guess this can be closed.

Thus fixed.

As mentioned earlier same problem would exist for cross-armv*-gcc6 as well but I am not particularly concerned at this moment.

Also as the cross-avr-gcc (without suffix) symlink package is not generated using this compiler is needlessly challenging. Should I open separate bug for that?

Well, I'd answer that a new package should provide such links, not 'gcc'. Or we can use alternatives for crosses ... (I'd be open to that). In any case I won't be working on it but won't oppose either a new package for symlinking and maybe providing useful Requires (avr-newlib...), like cross-avr. Or doing alternatives (I guess I prefer the new package a bit more). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.