Comment # 10 on bug 1022404 from Richard Biener

(In reply to Michal Suchanek from comment #9)
> > avr-gcc-6 -c test.c ; echo $?
> 0
> 
> The cross-avr-gcc6 from devel:gcc does work this test case.
> 
> Also the new naming is technically more correct for the avr case so I guess
> this can be closed.

Thus fixed.

> As mentioned earlier same problem would exist for cross-armv*-gcc6 as well
> but I am not particularly concerned at this moment.
> 
> Also as the cross-avr-gcc (without suffix) symlink package is not generated
> using this compiler is needlessly challenging. Should I open separate bug
> for that?

Well, I'd answer that a new package should provide such links, not 'gcc'.

Or we can use alternatives for crosses ... (I'd be open to that).

In any case I won't be working on it but won't oppose either a new package
for symlinking and maybe providing useful Requires (avr-newlib...), like
cross-avr.  Or doing alternatives (I guess I prefer the new package a bit
more).