[Bug 1205456] New: patch "openSUSE-SLE-15.4-2022-2969" conflicts with packman packages
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205456 Bug ID: 1205456 Summary: patch "openSUSE-SLE-15.4-2022-2969" conflicts with packman packages Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Distribution Version: Leap 15.4 Hardware: Other OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Maintenance Assignee: maintenance@opensuse.org Reporter: martin.wilck@suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs@suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- Created attachment 862909 --> https://bugzilla.suse.com/attachment.cgi?id=862909&action=edit screenshot from gpk-update-viewer Patch openSUSE-SLE-15.4-2022-2969 breaks updating Leap 15.4 because of a conflict with libswresample. The graphical update tool gpk-update-viewer runs into an error that unexperienced users might not understand. "zypper patch --with-optional" would install the patch, changing a bunch of ffmpeg and avcodec related packages from Packman to SUSE LLC, which is most probably not what the users want. "zypper update" skips these updates instead. It is unclear to me why these conflicts are in the patch meta data. It's obviously possible to update the other packages (non-ffmpeg) without breaking any package-level dependencies. Several users have posted about this in the Forum: https://www.opensuse-forum.de/thread/65990-softwareaktualisierung-funktionie... https://forums.opensuse.org/showthread.php/574888-openSUSE-SLE-15-4-2022-296... Is there a deeper reason for creating this artificial conflict? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205456
Marcus Meissner
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205456
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205456#c1
--- Comment #1 from Marcus Meissner
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205456
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205456#c2
--- Comment #2 from Martin Wilck
Application of the SUSE patch would require a vendor change (flipping all the binaries from Packman over to the SUSE ones).
And this is what users who have the packman packages installed probably don't want. I just wonder about those conflicts. Are they necessary to make the patch work? The biggest issue IMO is that this breaks the graphical updater in a way that's non-obvious to apprentice users. It leaves people like my wife or my daughter totally clueless. Even for me as experienced user it was non-obvious if I could simply deselect this patch and be good (besides ffmpeg, the patchinfo mentioned a lot of KDE updates that I wouldn't want to miss). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205456
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205456#c4
--- Comment #4 from Martin Wilck
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205456
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205456#c5
Marcus Meissner
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205456
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205456#c6
--- Comment #6 from Marcus Meissner
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205456
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205456#c8
--- Comment #8 from Olaf Hering
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205456
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205456#c11
--- Comment #11 from Martin Wilck
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205456
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205456#c12
Olaf Hering
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205456
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205456#c13
--- Comment #13 from Olaf Hering
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205456
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205456#c14
--- Comment #14 from Olaf Hering
participants (1)
-
bugzilla_noreply@suse.com