[Bug 1188914] New: [Build H.401.1] openQA test fails in podman - conmon updated suspected of breaking podman tests
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1188914 Bug ID: 1188914 Summary: [Build H.401.1] openQA test fails in podman - conmon updated suspected of breaking podman tests Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE Tumbleweed Version: Current Hardware: Other URL: https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/1861954/modules/podm an/steps/71 OS: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Containers Assignee: alexandre.vicenzi@suse.com Reporter: rbrown@suse.com QA Contact: qa-bugs@suse.de Found By: openQA Blocker: Yes ## Observation openQA test in scenario microos-Staging:H-Staging-DVD-x86_64-container-host-microos@64bit-2G-HD40G fails in [podman](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/1861954/modules/podman/steps/71) https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/1861954#step/podman/71 Looks like conmon keeps processes open even after the container has been deleted ## Test suite description ## Reproducible Fails since (at least) Build [H.401.1](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/1861904) ## Expected result Last good: [H.400.1](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/1832674) (or more recent) ## Further details Always latest result in this scenario: [latest](https://openqa.opensuse.org/tests/latest?arch=x86_64&distri=microos&flavor=Staging-DVD&machine=64bit-2G-HD40G&test=container-host-microos&version=Staging%3AH) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1188914
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1188914#c5
Richard Brown
One solution discussed here (https://github.com/containers/podman/issues/10735) is to switch from runc to crun.
This would be my preference
Another solution discussed here (https://github.com/containers/common/issues/631) is to keep common locked to 0.39.0 until the issue is fixed in other places.
I wouldn't object to this
Probably this (https://github.com/containers/podman/issues/11031) is the solution and should get merged for the next podman release or maybe 3.3.0.
Both solutions work, Richard, what do you think?
How hard would it be to move to crun? Just a quick flick of the config in this package and away we go? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1188914
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1188914#c12
Aleksa Sarai
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1188914
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1188914#c15
--- Comment #15 from Dario Faggioli
(In reply to Dario Faggioli from comment #11)
(In reply to Dario Faggioli from comment #10)
FWIW, I tried to do that here:
https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:dfaggioli:branches: Virtualization:containers/crun
Would be nice to build for architectures that are in https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/devel:kubic, but I guess that's covered in your branch.
s390 and ppc64le are available in our labs.
Well, SR https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/914071 , where I implemented what I proposed above, is now in factory. Basically, I've dropped the ExclusiveArch, so the package should be buildable on any arch that satisfies the dependencies. And libkrun is only going to be a dependency if we are on x86 or aarch64. Hope this could help. :-) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1188914
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1188914#c18
Richard Brown
participants (1)
-
bugzilla_noreply＠suse.com