http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1137061 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1137061#c10 --- Comment #10 from Steffen Winterfeldt --- An addition as suggested in comment 8 would imho more confuse the user than help. There's nothing to it: if shim+grub behaves differently than grub in the non-secureboot case but we use shim+grub as the default on the assumption that it does the same - then it is hard to explain no matter what. It's clear that the integrated grub config can't be adjusted as the binary is signed. But what prevents adding the btrfs subvolume mount to the generated grub.cfg? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.