http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=946673 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=946673#c11 Petr Uzel <puzel@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(puzel@suse.com) | --- Comment #11 from Petr Uzel <puzel@suse.com> --- (In reply to Arvin Schnell from comment #7)

That all looks very fragile. Petr, would it be possible to add explicit commands to parted to repair and/or fix the GPT to avoid the interactive mode completely?

Such explicit command would be label (GPT) specific and parted does not have any 'code infrastructure' for such concepts. Result would be yet another non-upstreamable hack with a lot of code duplication or libparted API breakage. What if I patch parted so that in noninteractive mode it would fix GPT instead of ignoring the issues? Would this be sufficient? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.