Comment # 11 on bug 946673 from Petr Uzel

(In reply to Arvin Schnell from comment #7)
> That all looks very fragile. Petr, would it be possible to add explicit
> commands to parted to repair and/or fix the GPT to avoid the interactive
> mode completely?

Such explicit command would be label (GPT) specific and parted does not have
any 'code infrastructure' for such concepts. Result would be yet another
non-upstreamable hack with a lot of code duplication or libparted API breakage.

What if I patch parted so that in noninteractive mode it would fix GPT instead
of ignoring the issues? Would this be sufficient?