http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599224
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599224#c0
Summary: add link fsck.btrfs -> btrfsck Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 11.3 Version: Factory Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Basesystem AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening@forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: aschnell@novell.com QAContact: qa@suse.de Found By: Development Blocker: ---
mkinitrd complaines about missing fsck.btrfs. Unfortunately the program is called btrfsck.
I suppose a link fsck.btrfs -> btrfsck is the best solution (like for msdos and vfat).
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599224
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599224#c
yang xiaoyu xyyang@novell.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |xyyang@novell.com AssignedTo|bnc-team-screening@forge.pr |mmarek@novell.com |ovo.novell.com |
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599224
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599224#c1
Michal Marek mmarek@novell.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mmarek@novell.com AssignedTo|mmarek@novell.com |dmueller@novell.com
--- Comment #1 from Michal Marek mmarek@novell.com 2010-04-26 09:37:06 UTC --- Please make it a hardlink (like /sbin/fsck.ext[234] and /sbin/e2fsck), otherwise mkinitrd will package a dangling symlink.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599224
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599224#c2
Dirk Mueller dmueller@novell.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #2 from Dirk Mueller dmueller@novell.com 2010-04-29 11:16:25 CEST --- submitted for factory
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599224
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599224#c3
Thorsten Kukuk kukuk@novell.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|FIXED |
--- Comment #3 from Thorsten Kukuk kukuk@novell.com 2010-05-07 12:30:23 UTC --- Not acceptable for checkin, btrfsck is not option compatible with fsck, this will break filesystem check at boot time.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599224
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599224#c4
Dirk Mueller dmueller@novell.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #4 from Dirk Mueller dmueller@novell.com 2010-05-07 17:29:47 CEST --- ok, thanks for letting me know, reverted.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599224
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599224#c5
Some One novell.xq0@gishpuppy.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |novell.xq0@gishpuppy.com
--- Comment #5 from Some One novell.xq0@gishpuppy.com 2010-08-01 00:27:19 UTC --- So does anyone have any updates on this one? This bug is present in the final release as well.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599224
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599224#c6
Dirk Mueller dmueller@novell.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |aj@novell.com
--- Comment #6 from Dirk Mueller dmueller@novell.com 2010-12-16 19:19:22 CET --- *** Bug 659922 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659922
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599224
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599224#c7
--- Comment #7 from Andreas Jaeger aj@novell.com 2010-12-16 20:45:35 UTC --- If the options are not compatible, then let's make the compatible - please report the incompatibility upstream so that it gets fixed.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599224
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599224#c8
Robert Kaiser kairo@kairo.at changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kairo@kairo.at
--- Comment #8 from Robert Kaiser kairo@kairo.at 2011-01-20 16:47:58 UTC --- Due to bug 665899, this has turned fatal now. I claim that this is a failure of the boot process even wanting to fsck a btrfs root partition, while this bug here is just a convenience measure, as btrfs doesn't need a fsck at boot.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599224
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599224#c9
Dan Elder delder@novacoast.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |delder@novacoast.com
--- Comment #9 from Dan Elder delder@novacoast.com 2011-03-09 21:25:17 UTC --- Yup, this is definitely bad. Considering that the stated goal of Novell is to never support ext4 and instead use btrfs for their next generation file system it would be nice to get it supported sooner rather than later so we can iron out all the kinks.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599224
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599224#c10
Martin Konold external.martin.konold@de.bosch.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|P5 - None |P1 - Urgent Version|Factory |Final Component|Basesystem |Basesystem CC| |external.martin.konold@de.b | |osch.com AssignedTo|dmueller@novell.com |bnc-team-screening@forge.pr | |ovo.novell.com Target Milestone|--- |Final Product|openSUSE 11.3 |openSUSE 11.4 Severity|Normal |Major
--- Comment #10 from Martin Konold external.martin.konold@de.bosch.com 2011-03-11 14:27:45 CET --- Still present in 11.4 release
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599224
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599224#c
Dirk Mueller dmueller@novell.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bnc-team-screening@forge.pr |dmueller@novell.com |ovo.novell.com | Severity|Major |Critical
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599224
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599224#c11
--- Comment #11 from Martin Konold external.martin.konold@de.bosch.com 2011-04-21 14:31:00 CEST --- Hi,
what are the plans in solving this issue?
For whom we are waiting here?
After all it is in the very interest of OpenSUSE to have early adopters of btrfs.
Yours, -- martin
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599224
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599224#c12
--- Comment #12 from Martin Konold external.martin.konold@de.bosch.com 2011-07-19 12:36:21 CEST --- Hi Dirk,
can you comment on this issue?
Yours, -- martin
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599224
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599224#c13
--- Comment #13 from Martin Konold external.martin.konold@de.bosch.com 2011-07-26 13:47:58 CEST --- IMHO this should be resolved asap.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599224
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599224#c
Dirk Mueller dmueller@suse.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|dmueller@suse.com |mfasheh@novell.com
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599224
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599224#c14
Bernhard Wiedemann bwiedemann@suse.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bwiedemann@suse.com
--- Comment #14 from Bernhard Wiedemann bwiedemann@suse.com 2011-08-31 18:13:25 CEST --- btrfsprogs package on Factory contains an fsck.btrfs binary that neither calls the real btrfsck program nor looks at the filesystem. Actually, it is a copy of /bin/true
Also note bug 655906 about -a option that is not understood by btrfsck and would make a symlink useless.
However, recent Factory testruns still fail to boot after installation because of missing fsck.btrfs. Looks thus: http://openqa.opensuse.org/viewimg/opensuse/testresults/openSUSE-NET-i586-Bu... Maybe the btrfsprogs package is not installed?
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599224
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599224#c15
Bernhard Wiedemann bwiedemann@suse.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lslezak@suse.com, | |ma@suse.com
--- Comment #15 from Bernhard Wiedemann bwiedemann@suse.com 2011-09-02 17:32:02 CEST --- so I talked to Arvin to find how it is supposed to work... yast2 storage writes /etc/sysconfig/storage with a USED_FS_LIST="ext4 btrfs swap" entry in this case. However, the writing does only happen after the "User Settings" and before the "Installation Overview" screen.
btrfsprogs has a Supplements: filesystem(btrfs) and some yast2-pkg-bindings/libzypp magic should thus add btrfsprogs to the list of packages that need to be installed
so what is missing or failing here?
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599224
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599224#c
Michael Andres ma@suse.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |668588
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599224
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599224#c16
Michael Andres ma@suse.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|Basesystem |YaST2 Depends on|668588 | AssignedTo|mfasheh@suse.com |bnc-team-screening@forge.pr | |ovo.novell.com QAContact|qa@suse.de |jsrain@suse.com
--- Comment #16 from Michael Andres ma@suse.com 2011-09-06 13:00:46 CEST --- Looks like this is due to bnc#668588.
For the solver fs-dependencies supplement the always 'installed' system package. So in case the solverflags 'ignorealreadyrecommended' (or 'onlyrequires') are set, those packages won't be selected.
- IMO YaST should turn on 'ignorealreadyrecommended' when doing installations in unattended modes (i.e. config modules installing packages or yast -i). Those acttions should not attract unrelated packages.
- During system installation/update it should be turned off to resolve this bug. (@Ladislav: pls. check whether SLE11SP is affected by this too)
- Interactive and in the running system a toggle, as it seems to be introduced by bnc#668588, is probably OK.
A more user friendly solution could be to have an initial solver run (with 'ignorealreadyrecommended' off) without any package being selected. If the solver now selects outstanding recommendations, collect them in a list and present them to the user. Say 'These are package recommended by your system. Decide which of them should be installed and which not.' If the user deselects some packages from the list and later commits, they will be weak-locked so they won't show up in the list the next time. Also add a 'I'll think about this later' button, and if pressed continue with 'ignorealreadyrecommended' turned on.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599224
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599224#c
Michael Andres ma@suse.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |668588
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599224
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599224#c17
--- Comment #17 from Michael Andres ma@suse.com 2011-09-06 13:07:07 CEST --- WORKAROUND: Enter package selection and manually uncheck 'Options' -> 'Ignore Recommended Packages for Already Installed Packages'
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599224
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599224#c18
Ludwig Nussel lnussel@suse.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |per@opensuse.org
--- Comment #18 from Ludwig Nussel lnussel@suse.com 2011-09-09 09:20:09 CEST --- *** Bug 360689 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=360689
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599224
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599224#c
Bug 599224 depends on bug 668588, which changed state.
Bug 668588 Summary: set ignorealreadyrecommended true by default http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668588
What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|FIXED |
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599224
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599224#c19
Ludwig Nussel lnussel@suse.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|add link fsck.btrfs -> |working fsck.btrfs needed |btrfsck |
--- Comment #19 from Ludwig Nussel lnussel@suse.com 2011-09-09 10:49:57 CEST --- I've reopened bug 668588. Let's keep this one about btrfsck.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599224
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599224#c
Ludwig Nussel lnussel@suse.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mfasheh@suse.com AssignedTo|bnc-team-screening@forge.pr |dmueller@suse.com |ovo.novell.com |
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599224
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599224#c
Bug 599224 depends on bug 668588, which changed state.
Bug 668588 Summary: set ignorealreadyrecommended true by default http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668588
What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599224
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599224#c
Bug 599224 depends on bug 668588, which changed state.
Bug 668588 Summary: set ignorealreadyrecommended true by default http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668588
What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|FIXED |
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599224
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599224#c
Bug 599224 depends on bug 668588, which changed state.
Bug 668588 Summary: set ignorealreadyrecommended true by default http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668588
What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |NEEDINFO Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |FIXED
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599224
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599224#c20
--- Comment #20 from Bernhard Wiedemann bwiedemann@suse.com 2011-10-11 09:47:37 CEST --- on 2011-09-30 two successful btrfs testruns of Factory were seen http://openqa.opensuse.org/results/openSUSE-NET-x86_64-Build0315-btrfs
so for 12.1 this should be fixed
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599224
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599224#c21
Ladislav Slezak lslezak@suse.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #21 from Ladislav Slezak lslezak@suse.com 2011-10-11 08:05:45 UTC --- Fixed in 12.1 => resolving as FIXED.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599224 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599224#c22
--- Comment #22 from Bernhard Wiedemann bwiedemann@suse.com --- This is an autogenerated message for OBS integration: This bug (599224) was mentioned in https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/39073 Factory / btrfsprogs https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/41263 Factory / btrfsprogs
-
bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com