[Bug 558964] New: Valgrind: unhandled syscall: 332
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=558964 http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=558964#c0 Summary: Valgrind: unhandled syscall: 332 Classification: openSUSE Product: openSUSE 11.2 Version: Final Platform: i686 OS/Version: openSUSE 11.2 Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Development AssignedTo: pth@novell.com ReportedBy: mwelinder@gmail.com QAContact: qa@suse.de Found By: --- Blocker: --- User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091103 SUSE/3.5.5-1.1.2 Firefox/3.5.5 Something in the gtk stack has started using syscall 332, but OS 11.2's valgrind has not caught up. Here's partial output from Gnumeric t8000 test. (Note: the reference to buggy valgrind refers to problems with long double and is irrelevant here.) This is fixed upstream: http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202315 t8000-valgrind.pl: Check the core with valgrind. ** (/home/welinder/gnome/gnumeric/src/.libs/ssconvert:18955): WARNING **: Runnin g under buggy valgrind, see http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=164298 Using exporter Gnumeric_XmlIO:sax | ==18955== Memcheck, a memory error detector | ==18955== Copyright (C) 2002-2009, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al. | ==18955== Using Valgrind-3.5.0 and LibVEX; rerun with -h for copyright info | ==18955== Command: /home/welinder/gnome/gnumeric/src/.libs/ssconvert --recalc ./samples/excel/statfuns.xls statfuns.gnumeric | ==18955== Parent PID: 18952 | ==18955== | --18955-- WARNING: unhandled syscall: 332 | --18955-- You may be able to write your own handler. | --18955-- Read the file README_MISSING_SYSCALL_OR_IOCTL. | --18955-- Nevertheless we consider this a bug. Please report | --18955-- it at http://valgrind.org/support/bug_reports.html. | ==18955== [...] Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: cd gnumneric cd test /t8000-valgrind.pl -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=558964
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=558964#c
Philipp Thomas
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=558964
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=558964#c
Dirk Mueller
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=558964
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=558964#c1
Dirk Mueller
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=558964
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=558964#c2
--- Comment #2 from Marcus Meissner
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=558964
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=558964#c3
Swamp Workflow Management
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=558964
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=558964#c4
Christian Dengler
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=558964
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=558964#c6
Dirk Mueller
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=558964
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=558964#c7
Swamp Workflow Management
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=558964
http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=558964#c
Swamp Workflow Management
participants (1)
-
bugzilla_noreply@novell.com