[Bug 296857] New: SLES10 (sp1) installer doesn't generate proper EIT/ GPT Tables
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=296857 Summary: SLES10 (sp1) installer doesn't generate proper EIT/GPT Tables Product: SUSE Linux 10.1 Version: Final Platform: x86-64 OS/Version: SLES 10 Status: NEW Severity: Blocker Priority: P5 - None Component: Kernel AssignedTo: kernel-maintainers@forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: dl_org_dc_infrastructure_tools@combots.com QAContact: qa@suse.de Found By: Other The following hardware configuration was used to install SLES10(sp1), which failed (not completly): 1. OEM Hardware, 2x Dual Core Opteron, 16GB Ram, Areca SATA Raid6 Controller, 16x500GB Drives in RAID6 mode, with two volumes First Volume: 73 GB Second Volume: 6.3TB 2. HP Series: 2.1. HP DL365, 16GB Ram, 2x Dual Core Opteron P800 SmartArray Controller, 4 Internal SAS drives, external MSA 60 Storage with 12x 750GB Drives attached 3 Volumes: - First Volume: Raid1 over 2 Sata drives, 120GB, (Internal) - Second Volume: Raid1 Over 2 Sata drivers: 120GB (Internal) - Third Volume: Raid6 over 12x 750GB Drives (external storage) 2.2. DP DL320s, P400 SmartArray, 1x Dual Core Xeon, 12x 500GB internal SATA Drives 2 Volumes in Raid6 Mode: - First Volume: 80GB - Second Volume: The rest (more then 4 TB) As install media a sles10(sp1) dvd image was used, yast recognized all controllers and volumes without any problems, when the up2date hp cciss driver were used while booting. Creating the necessary partitions on the volumes works, too, even on the >2TB ones. The partition tables are for <2TB partitions: msdos lable, for the >2TB ones they are EIT/GPT tables, which is also correct. The reboot into the production system failed with mounting every >2TB Partitions. Logfile told me (as only error report), that the superblock on those partitions is corrupted. On all >2TB partitions, XFS as filesystem was used. The same applies to all other partitions but the boot partitions, which is ext2. Recreating the partition manually with parted and reformating the partition with mkxfs works again, and the volume is mountable. Rebooting it afterwards results in the same error message. Deleting the EIT/GPT table from the volume, and creating the XFS FS directly on the blockdevice (e.g. /dev/sdb (areca) or /dev/cciss/c0d1 (smart array controller) and changing fstab and rebooting, the volume is mounted without any error and works as expected. This setup is also not working with Ubuntu Feisty, but worked with Ubuntu Dapper and SLES9 (sp3) (at least with the OEM machine, because SLES9/Ubuntu Dapper doesn't know anything about the p400/p800 controller and doesn't recognize the large volumes (means >2TB), HP changed the cciss driver after dapper release). So, regarding SLES10, this is a regression. I know that this setup is not the standard, but since most DCs are in need in cheap storage solutions (SAN is not cheap ;)) machines like the DL320s from HP will become more popular. You can't even compare those machines (and their setups) with Suns X4500 (6 Raid6 Controller with 8 Drives per controller, so 48 drives in one cage). If you need more information, please contact me directly via this bug report or by eMail/jabber (email: sthe@combots.com, jabber: sh@linux-server.org) Regards, ComBOTS Sysadmin (Stephan Hermann) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=296857#c1
--- Comment #1 from Peter Eckhardt
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=296857#c2
Greg Kroah-Hartman
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=296857#c3
Peter Eckhardt
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=296857#c4
Andreas Jaeger
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=296857#c5
--- Comment #5 from Peter Eckhardt
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=296857#c6
--- Comment #6 from Andreas Jaeger
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=296857#c7
--- Comment #7 from Peter Eckhardt
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=296857#c8
Andreas Jaeger
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=296857#c9
--- Comment #9 from Peter Eckhardt
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=296857#c10
Stefan Fent
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=296857
Stefan Fent
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=296857#c11
Stefan Fent
participants (1)
-
bugzilla_noreply@novell.com