http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062808 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062808#c14 Petr Gajdos changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(astieger@suse.com | |) --- Comment #14 from Petr Gajdos --- (In reply to Andreas Stieger from comment #13)

(In reply to Petr Gajdos from comment #12)

...

Maintenance: could we provide new package, gkrellm-cpupower meant as a replacement for gkrellm-cpufreq (for 42.3)?

We would rather not, zypper in not really capable of replacing packages that are not otherwise required.

gkrellm-cpufreq does not work at all. What about just add gkrellm-cpupower which does not fileconflict with gkrellm-cpufreq to update channels? And we can release gkrellm-cpufreq just with README.SUSE that it does not work and perhaps even Require gkrellm-cpupower from that package.

Please check kernel changes: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/ tools/power/cpupower/lib?id=ac5a181

Especially if cpufreq_cpu_exists needs to be replaced with cpupower_is_cpu_online.

This was first I tried. Unfortunately cpupower_is_cpu_online is private: cpupower-4.11[1]> find -name *.h -exec grep cpupower_is_cpu_online {} + ./lib/cpupower.h:int cpupower_is_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu); cpupower-4.11[1]> $ rpm -ql cpupower-devel | grep '\.h' /usr/include/cpufreq.h /usr/include/cpuidle.h $ And, as you know, 'our' gkrellm-cpufreq is hacked to use cpupower anyway, I think much better is to use new upstream version to find bugs etc, you know, open source. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.