http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1161873 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1161873#c1 Aaron Puchert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CONFIRMED --- Comment #1 from Aaron Puchert --- That's correct. What do you think about splitting this into llvm-vim-plugins and clang-vim-plugins, and renaming llvm-emacs-plugins to clang-emacs-plugins? Integrating the vim-plugins with the llvm package has the issue that we install files into /usr/share/vim, which might be a bit weird if vim is not installed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1161873 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1161873#c5 Aaron Puchert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CONFIRMED |IN_PROGRESS Assignee|bnc-team-screening@forge.pr |aaronpuchert@alice-dsl.net |ovo.novell.com | --- Comment #5 from Aaron Puchert --- Should be fixed by https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/768462. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1161873 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1161873#c7 Aaron Puchert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|FIXED |--- --- Comment #7 from Aaron Puchert --- While packaging the latest release candidate of LLVM 10 I noticed that my changes have the unintended side effect of prohibiting parallel installations of multiple clang versions. That pretty much defeats the effort of maintaining the update-alternatives mechanism. There are three possible solutions: 1. Reintroduce an editor plugin package, but let it depend on clang instead of llvm. 2. Let the scripts fall under the update-alternatives mechanism. For this to make sense though, we'd need to patch them so that they refer to the executables of the right version. For example in clang-format.py, we would replace "binary = 'clang-format'" by "binary = 'clang-format-%{_relver}'". 3. We package these files only for the latest version, as we do with python3-clang and libc++. The right solution is probably 2., but it comes with quite some effort... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1161873 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1161873#c16 --- Comment #16 from OBSbugzilla Bot --- This is an autogenerated message for OBS integration: This bug (1161873) was mentioned in https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/932377 Backports:SLE-15-SP3 / llvm12 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.