http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1189024 Tammo Oepkes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tammo.oepkes@suse.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1189024 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1189024#c2 --- Comment #2 from Tammo Oepkes --- (In reply to Dominique Leuenberger from comment #1)

That rather sounds like a zypper/libzypp bug not being able to handle the same names.

Later yesterday evening I compared the sway package/pattern behavior to similar patterns/packages (like kde, gnome, mint, cinnamon, lxde, lxqt). Out of these, the only package/pattern combination with identical names for package/pattern was cinnamon. But installing cinnamon package shows a different package selection than installing the cinnamon pattern. My original assumed cause (name conflict) seems to be wrong then. So it would be something specific to the sway package that causes the sway _pattern_ to be pulled as a dependency. --- toe@toe-tp-20uj ~ % sudo zypper install --type pattern cinnamon (...) The following 141 NEW packages are going to be installed: (...) The following 4 NEW patterns are going to be installed: basesystem cinnamon cinnamon_basis x11 141 new packages to install. Overall download size: 59,0 MiB. Already cached: 0 B. After the operation, additional 171,8 MiB will be used. Continue? [y/n/v/...? shows all options] (y): --- toe@toe-tp-20uj ~ % sudo zypper install cinnamon (...) The following 99 NEW packages are going to be installed: (...) 99 new packages to install. Overall download size: 29,1 MiB. Already cached: 0 B. After the operation, additional 70,5 MiB will be used. Continue? [y/n/v/...? shows all options] (y): -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1189024 Michael Andres changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(tammo.oepkes@suse | |.com) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1189024 Tammo Oepkes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|libzypp |Other Assignee|zypp-maintainers@suse.de |screening-team-bugs@suse.de Summary|Sway: potential name |Sway: sway package pulls |conflict pattern vs package |sway pattern as dependency -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1189024 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1189024#c6 --- Comment #6 from Tammo Oepkes --- Created attachment 851552 --> http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/attachment.cgi?id=851552&action=edit zypper solver test case Attached the solver test case. Line 179 of solver.result has install pattern:sway and line 180 has patterns-sway-sway, but it has no install reason. Package sway-branding-openSUSE has patterns-sway-sway under requires, while package sway-branding-upstream doesn't. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1189024 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1189024#c8 Michael Andres changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(tammo.oepkes@suse | |.com) | --- Comment #8 from Michael Andres --- In this case: The branding packages supplement the brnading that's installed. According to the testcase you have branding-openSUSE installed, so the solver chooses sway-branding-openSUSE which supplements (sway and branding-openSUSE). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1189024 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1189024#c10 Tammo Oepkes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|INVALID |--- --- Comment #10 from Tammo Oepkes --- (In reply to Michael Andres from comment #8)

According to the testcase you have branding-openSUSE installed, so the solver chooses sway-branding-openSUSE which supplements (sway and branding-openSUSE).

I hadn't installed anything on the system that relates to graphical interfaces until I installed Sway. Then it picked the branding-openSUSE during Sway install. Maybe branding-openSUSE was a remnant of the first sway installation run (according to https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1189024#c5) and the subsequent `--clean-deps` did not remove it. I'll do a new minimal install and provide another test case. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1189024 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1189024#c12 Denys Kondratenko changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |stdden@opensuse.org --- Comment #12 from Denys Kondratenko --- yeah, something is broken. I can reproduce on TW. Installing Sway should pick up upstream branding and minimal packages by default. Will debug it and see. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1189024 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1189024#c14 --- Comment #14 from Simon Lees --- Ahh I forgot to hit save on my previous comment. By default on openSUSE installs you should have a package branding-openSUSE installed, it should cause *-branding-openSUSE packages to be preferred over *-branding-upstream packages. Which at a guess is what is happening here. There is also a package branding-upstream, which if installed will cause people to prefer upstream branding everywhere (plymouth, lightdm etc as well as desktops). As far as i'm aware nothing else is recommending *-branding-upstream while the branding-openSUSE package is installed. As a work around you can encourage people to either install branding-upstream or "zypper in sway sway-branding-upstream". But i'm not really sure that installing sway-branding-upstream when branding-openSUSE is installed is the right thing to do I think this is the intended behavior in openSUSE. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1189024 http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1189024#c16 --- Comment #16 from Simon Lees --- (In reply to Denys Kondratenko from comment #15)

Hi Simon,

thanks for the hint.

When I was thinking about openSUSEway (sway DE for openSUSE), I thought: - openSUSEway package and/or pattern - to install branded openSUSE sway DE - patterns-sway-sway to install basic sway with upstream branding - sway should have only sway and branding package installed (with is default sway config)

So I was thinking: sway-branding-upstream should go with default sway installation.

For openSUSE branding - there is special package/pattern.

In the installation media - both patterns are available and could be chosen.

So I think I messed up somewhere in Supplements/branding so sway package somehow chooses openSUSE branding instead upstream one by default.

Thanks, Denys

I couldn't quite see where the sway-branding-openSUSE comes from, but in sway-branding-upstream you have "Supplements: (%{name} and branding-upstream)", if you wanted it to be the default for all systems you probably also want Supplements: (%{name} and branding-openSUSE)" then no supplements in the sway-branding-openSUSE package otherwise the solver would be back to having a choice. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.