http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064212 Franck Bui changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|bnc-team-screening@forge.pr |martin.wilck@suse.com |ovo.novell.com | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064212 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064212#c1 --- Comment #1 from Andrei Borzenkov --- OK, it was not this commit exactly, still ... Until revision 127 _service in Base:System/multipath-tools pointed to branch sles12-sp3 of https://github.com/openSUSE/multipath-tools.git which had patch from Hans Reinecke to handle dmraid (https://github.com/openSUSE/multipath-tools/commit/cc1690dd82bb011d163ddfac6...) Revision 128 was switched to branch factory that does not contain this patch. Upstream handled dmraid for a short time and then removed. So it /could/ be unintentional (as I'm not blessed with FATE access I do not know what was requested). OTOH I can understand if those rules are better seen as part of dmraid package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064212 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064212#c3 --- Comment #3 from Franck Bui --- (In reply to Martin Wilck from comment #2)

dmraid support has been dropped. See bug 1060551, comment 27.

Martin, please use this bug to discuss about the removal of the dmraid support in Factory. The other one is about the creation of multiple devices defining the same UUID link. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064212 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064212#c5 --- Comment #5 from Andrei Borzenkov --- (In reply to Franck Bui from comment #4)

Also Andrei (in bug 1060551, comment #18) wrote: "So we have clear regression.". I wrongly interpreted this but actually there's no regression it's just that for new installations the partitions won't exist but this shouldn't matter (see the previous question) ?

What do you mean "it should not matter"? 1. during installation YaST sets everything up on dmraid. 2. After reboot system does not come up because root device is not present anymore. The reason root device is not present is removed udev rules. if mdadm can handle everything dmraid can handle (I have my doubts) YaST should be fixed to not use dmraid in the first place. Otherwise we have situation where system working with Tumbleweed two months ago suddenly stops working after update. Also installation appears to succeed but resulting system is unbootable. If this is not regression, what is? :) If it is decided to remove support for dmraid from Tumbleweed, I would expect some warning in advance so users are aware and can prepare for it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064212 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064212#c8 Martin Wilck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #8 from Martin Wilck --- For now, dmraid support has been added back in the udev rules in tumbleweed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.