Comment # 4 on bug 1064212 from Franck Bui

Martin, you wrote in the other bug:

> If someone wants to reinstate the kpartx-on-dmraid behavior, simply add the old rule again:

Andrei asked (in bug 1060551, comment #2): "Is there any situation where we
*want* process individual partition even though it is known to be part of
dmraid?"

According to your changes the answer should be "no".

Also Andrei (in bug 1060551, comment #18) wrote: "So we have clear
regression.". I wrongly interpreted this but actually there's no regression
it's just that for new installations the partitions won't exist but this
shouldn't matter (see the previous question) ?