http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017461 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017461#c110 --- Comment #110 from Oliver Kurz <okurz@suse.com> --- (In reply to Harald Achitz from comment #109)

Oliver, is this a meaningful test? I mean, on a new installed system where there is nothing do to... this sounds not like something I would like to see as a test for my enterprise Linux.

What I conducted was just a very simple bug verification test run which does not mean there are more tests which could eventually lead to more information - and already did, this is why we (still) have other bugs in the same domain, e.g. the three "see also" bugs. With my comment being the 110th in row I think we should give our great kernel developers and contributors the achievement of "VERIFIED FIXED" at least on this bug ;)

automate this , have it as regression test, so that future patches btrfs fixes will not re trigger the test. (maybe I am naive, but this is what I would expect from something that calls itself enterprise linux)

no, you are not naive - this is what we do with automated tests on top of my very limited verification :) The original problem for exactly *this* bug was confirmed exactly on a "freshly installed system" hence the verification in a comparable environment. But there are more and longer running tests also on openqa.opensuse.org as well. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.