Comment # 110 on bug 1017461 from Oliver Kurz

(In reply to Harald Achitz from comment #109)
> Oliver, is this a meaningful test?  I mean, on a new installed system where
> there is nothing do to... this sounds not like something I would like to see
> as a test for my enterprise Linux.

What I conducted was just a very simple bug verification test run which does
not mean there are more tests which could eventually lead to more information -
and already did, this is why we (still) have other bugs in the same domain,
e.g. the three "see also" bugs. With my comment being the 110th in row I think
we should give our great kernel developers and contributors the achievement of
"VERIFIED FIXED" at least on this bug ;)

> automate this , have it as regression test, so that future patches btrfs
> fixes will not re trigger the test. (maybe I am naive, but this is what I
> would expect from something that calls itself enterprise linux)

no, you are not naive - this is what we do with automated tests on top of my
very limited verification :) The original problem for exactly *this* bug was
confirmed exactly on a "freshly installed system" hence the verification in a
comparable environment. But there are more and longer running tests also on
openqa.opensuse.org as well.