[Bug 441106] New: boot: wasted second
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441106 Summary: boot: wasted second Product: openSUSE 11.1 Version: Beta 3 Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Normal Priority: P5 - None Component: Basesystem AssignedTo: bnc-team-screening@forge.provo.novell.com ReportedBy: mmeeks@novell.com QAContact: qa@suse.de CC: coolo@suse.de Found By: --- So - as we boot, we call /etc/init.d/boot.clock - this does two calls to hwclock, each of which does: rc = synchronize_to_clock_tick(); /* this takes up to 1 second */ if (rc) return rc; The overall cost is around 1 -> 1.5 seconds and this is independent of machine performance - ie. this is a big / slow beastie ;-) While investigating I poked at boot.clock, and I was surprised to find my /etc/adjtime to be all zeros: 0.0 0 0.0 0 UTC ie. what the boot.clock script creates (apparently). And running on the commandline with debug I see fun like this: /sbin/hwclock --systohc -u -D .. Time elapsed since reference time has been 0.302102 seconds. Delaying further to reach the next full second. Setting Hardware Clock to 15:16:03 = 1225725363 seconds since 1969 ioctl(RTC_SET_TIME) was successful. Not adjusting drift factor because last calibration time is zero, so history is bad and calibration startover is necessary. and so on - which seems odd; I've booted & shutdown this machine several times - though I guess it's crashed a good few times too. I was hoping to special-case this 0 clock adjustment to speed things up, but now I play with hwclock more - it starts to give me real values there. So - questions: * Why do we wait this half second on average twice ? * Do we really need the clock to be this accurate ? - ie. why wait ? * Do we even need adjtime on modern machines - has this problem gone away ? * Can we not adjust the time (perhaps just the seconds) asynchronously while the boot process continues ? + What about NTP ? can we use this by default instead & avoid this - presumably NTP has a good way of adjusting the time safely later in the day (?) Anyhow - sorry for the staggering ignorance - hopefully they're easy questions to answer :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441106 Stephan Kulow <coolo@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|coolo@suse.de |coolo@novell.com AssignedTo|bnc-team-screening@forge.provo.novell.com |werner@novell.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441106 User werner@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441106#c1 Dr. Werner Fink <werner@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mkoenig@novell.com, ro@novell.com Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID --- Comment #1 from Dr. Werner Fink <werner@novell.com> 2008-11-04 03:39:15 MST --- First of all I'm not maintainer of boot.clock, second there is no shell function synchronize_to_clock_tick() within the boot scripts nor I've written any one (if the C source of hwclock uses such a function you should ask the author of hwclock), third one the initial /etc/adjtime is fully correct as this file is written (if exist) at shutdown (compare with manual page). Btw: Yes we need an accurate time to get correct mount time in the inodes of the mounted file systems. Beside this at mount time there is no ntp, no network to reach a ntp server, and AFAIK most systems out there do not have a radio clock on board. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441106 User mmeeks@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441106#c2 Michael Meeks <mmeeks@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|INVALID | --- Comment #2 from Michael Meeks <mmeeks@novell.com> 2008-11-05 21:11:46 MST --- you might notices the synchronize method is C ;-) and thus part of hwclock. If this is a hwclock issue - please do help by assigning it to the relevant maintainer of util-linux [ I have no idea who that is ]. Wrt. getting the correct time; clearly that is a good idea. My question is - how correct do we want to be ? to the microsecond ? or to the second ? how accurate do you expect the mount time to be ? Presumably the fact that the mount time can be in the past when NTP corrects a badly wrong system clock must be handled too - so; really, I don't understand your concerns. So - again, do we need to wait 1.5 seconds as a result of boot.clock ? or can we be somewhat less precise (perhaps just for the Desktop case), in order to save 3% of our boot time ? ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441106 User werner@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441106#c3 Dr. Werner Fink <werner@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hare@novell.com, duwe@novell.com --- Comment #3 from Dr. Werner Fink <werner@novell.com> 2008-11-06 03:15:42 MST --- This bug is INVALID. We depend on a correct time before the local file systems will be mounted ... otherwise we may see a time shift during the mounts getting wrong order (in time) of the mount points. You may discuss this with Theodore Ts'o, the author of the Utilities for the Second Extended File System. If you have a better idea please provide a patch or script to avoid this troubles ;) ... IMHO the clock stuff should be moved into initrd but for support of adjtime and the correct time zone this would require support within grub to. In other words at shutdown the data for adjtime and the current timezone has to be put to /boot and grub should add this data e.g. in the kernels command line. This would enable us to use /sbin/hwclock in the initrd image. Then you could set up the time at start of initrd script and force the synchronization before the file system check and the final mount of the real root found on the hard disk. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441106 User mkoenig@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441106#c4 Matthias Koenig <mkoenig@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID --- Comment #4 from Matthias Koenig <mkoenig@novell.com> 2008-11-06 04:21:14 MST --- The synchronization to the clock tick in hwclock is done on purpose and will not be changed. We want times as exact as possible. "Wait until the falling edge of the Hardware Clock's update flag so that any time that is read from the clock immediately after we return will be exact. The clock only has 1 second precision, so it gives the exact time only once per second, right on the falling edge of the update flag." -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441106 User garloff@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441106#c5 Kurt Garloff <garloff@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |garloff@novell.com Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|INVALID | --- Comment #5 from Kurt Garloff <garloff@novell.com> 2008-11-19 13:04:35 MST --- REOPEN: This can be solved more intelligently. Will attach patches here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441106 User garloff@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441106#c6 --- Comment #6 from Kurt Garloff <garloff@novell.com> 2008-11-19 16:22:06 MST --- Created an attachment (id=253672) --> (https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=253672) hwclock-raiseprio.diff -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441106 User garloff@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441106#c7 --- Comment #7 from Kurt Garloff <garloff@novell.com> 2008-11-19 16:22:36 MST --- Created an attachment (id=253673) --> (https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=253673) hwclock-cpufriendly.diff -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441106 User garloff@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441106#c8 --- Comment #8 from Kurt Garloff <garloff@novell.com> 2008-11-19 16:23:02 MST --- Created an attachment (id=253674) --> (https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=253674) hwclock-nowait.diff -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441106 User garloff@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441106#c9 --- Comment #9 from Kurt Garloff <garloff@novell.com> 2008-11-19 16:23:27 MST --- Created an attachment (id=253675) --> (https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=253675) hwclock-adjust-and-hctosys.diff -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441106 User garloff@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441106#c10 --- Comment #10 from Kurt Garloff <garloff@novell.com> 2008-11-19 16:23:49 MST --- Created an attachment (id=253676) --> (https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=253676) boot.clock.diff -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441106 User garloff@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441106#c11 --- Comment #11 from Kurt Garloff <garloff@novell.com> 2008-11-19 16:31:34 MST --- (1) Reduce jitter in accuracy by raising CPU priority (2) Reduce CPU usage by being more clever in busy-waiting (3) Introduce --nowait --preadjust options to get a quick estimate for system time (which can be up to 2s late now, never early) (4) Allow --adjust and --hctosys to be used together. Also adjusts (3) to be max 1s late and saves CPU time in case we really adjust. Last patch is to boot.clock (aaa_base). With this we save ~1.5s boot time and ~1.4s CPU time. I have done quite some testing. Test packages in ~garloff/Export/11.1/ (x86_64). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441106 User werner@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441106#c12 Dr. Werner Fink <werner@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |werner@novell.com AssignedTo|werner@novell.com |mkoenig@novell.com Status|REOPENED |NEW --- Comment #12 from Dr. Werner Fink <werner@novell.com> 2008-11-20 03:28:49 MST --- As already mentioned I'm not the maintainer of hwclock. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441106 User werner@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441106#c13 Dr. Werner Fink <werner@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Info Provider| |garloff@novell.com --- Comment #13 from Dr. Werner Fink <werner@novell.com> 2008-11-20 03:35:16 MST --- Beside this: IMHO the adjtime option will become useless is combined with --nowait as the time difference between CMOS and System clock is not very accurate now that is that if booted very often now a intrinsic jitter is added even with your patches. Beside this the lines: /sbin/hwclock --hctosys --nowait $HWCLOCK rc_status /sbin/hwclock --hctosys $HWCLOCK >/dev/null 2>&1 & also makes no sence as now the clock may jump during checking and/or mounting the local file system making the time stamps not ver accurate .. OK we will not see jump larger than a second due to the first line. Next is that the problem with the root file system checked and mounted in the initrd isn't covered at all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441106 User mmeeks@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441106#c14 Michael Meeks <mmeeks@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW Info Provider|garloff@novell.com | --- Comment #14 from Michael Meeks <mmeeks@novell.com> 2008-11-20 04:26:17 MST --- Hi Werner. I guess Kurt forgot to attach an actual patch to boot.clock instead of a description, which (when read with the patches) of course helps explain how this works. As I understand it you need: /sbin/hwclock --preadjust --nowait --hctosys $HWCLOCK This does the adjustment to the hwclock of the potentially long time powered off we've just had. *But* it does not write to /etc/adjtime. OTOH it guarentees that we are early, by around 1-2 seconds. This lets us get on with the boot process - while the other patches clearly allow a far less CPU intensive, intelligent and (hopefully accurate) catch of the hwclock edge - and the re-run of: /sbin/hwclock --adjust --hctosys $HWCLOCK 2>&1 & Is conceptually identical (yet more efficient) to the previous behaviour of the two commands in boot.clock - and allows the boot to continue - it will give us just as an accurate adjtime setting, and - it will only move the time 'forwards' (ie. still monotomically increasing) well, where is the problem ? So - basically, this looks bullet-proof to me, saves us an embarassing chunk of time at boot, is just as accurate, and is - well, just the right thing to do - Kurt: you rock :-) Werner - can you expand on the problem with the root file-system mount; I didn't get that: do we do some magic & copying over of adjtime later in the day after re-mounting the root (or somesuch ?). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441106 User werner@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441106#c15 --- Comment #15 from Dr. Werner Fink <werner@novell.com> 2008-11-20 04:55:00 MST --- I see a problem with the time stamps set within the SB and inodes of the file systems set during mount. The problem is if the system clock jumps backward and the order of the mounts are not the same as the apparent order given by those time stamps. Next point is that the patches should go upstream *first*, that is that we should avoid SuSE patches within the package util-linux. But I'm not the maintainer of util-linux. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441106 User mmeeks@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441106#c16 --- Comment #16 from Michael Meeks <mmeeks@novell.com> 2008-11-20 05:42:03 MST ---
I see a problem with the time stamps set within the SB and inodes of the file systems set during mount. The problem is if the system clock jumps backward and the order of the mounts are not the same as the apparent order given by those time stamps.
Which is why the change is designed -never- to jump the system clock backwards - only forwards. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441106 User garloff@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441106#c17 --- Comment #17 from Kurt Garloff <garloff@novell.com> 2008-11-20 08:17:03 MST --- Indeed. The patches are done such that the system time is between 0 and 1s _behind_ the time we would get when not doing --nowait. So we have a jump forward by 0--1s approx. 1.5s later in the boot process. Something which should be very harmless. Nevertheless, we're late in the cycle. Matthias Koenig suggested not to do intrusive changes so late, but instead push stuff upstream ... So I reworked the patches a bit. And I would only ask to get the first one in for SLE11, which still saves us one second of time by not calling hwclock twice. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441106 User garloff@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441106#c18 Kurt Garloff <garloff@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #253675|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #18 from Kurt Garloff <garloff@novell.com> 2008-11-20 08:21:58 MST --- Created an attachment (id=253949) --> (https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=253949) hwclock-adjust-and-hctosys.diff The first patch. The only one I would like to get in for now into SLE11, as we're indeed late in the game. (For the others, we can await upstream acceptance). This patch alone will save exactly 1s boot time (and 1s CPU time). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441106 User garloff@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441106#c19 Kurt Garloff <garloff@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #253676|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #19 from Kurt Garloff <garloff@novell.com> 2008-11-20 08:23:29 MST --- Created an attachment (id=253951) --> (https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=253951) boot.clock.diff The required minimal change in the boot.clock script for only using the (now) first patch. Nothing synchronous any more ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441106 User garloff@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441106#c20 Kurt Garloff <garloff@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #253949|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #20 from Kurt Garloff <garloff@novell.com> 2008-11-20 08:26:28 MST --- Created an attachment (id=253953) --> (https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=253953) hwclock-adjust-and-hctosys.diff Sorry, ignore the last two attachments. I had sent from wrong machine where the old patches were still laying around. So this is the one and only I want to get in for SLE11, saving 1s boot and 1s CPU time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441106 User garloff@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441106#c21 --- Comment #21 from Kurt Garloff <garloff@novell.com> 2008-11-20 08:27:50 MST --- Created an attachment (id=253954) --> (https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=253954) boot.clock.diff The corresponding diff to boot.clock. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441106 User garloff@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441106#c22 Kurt Garloff <garloff@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #253672|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #22 from Kurt Garloff <garloff@novell.com> 2008-11-20 08:28:41 MST --- Created an attachment (id=253956) --> (https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=253956) hwclock-raiseprio.diff Just for completeness. Will post upstream before asking for inclusion on 11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441106 User garloff@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441106#c23 Kurt Garloff <garloff@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #253674|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #23 from Kurt Garloff <garloff@novell.com> 2008-11-20 08:29:45 MST --- Created an attachment (id=253958) --> (https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=253958) hwclock-nowait.diff Just for completeness, will post upstream prior to asking to 11 inclusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441106 Kurt Garloff <garloff@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #253951|0 |1 is obsolete| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441106 User garloff@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441106#c24 Kurt Garloff <garloff@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #253673|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #24 from Kurt Garloff <garloff@novell.com> 2008-11-20 08:31:50 MST --- Created an attachment (id=253959) --> (https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=253959) hwclock-cpufriendly.diff Just for completeness. Will only look into SLE11 inclusion after upstream feedback. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441106 User garloff@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441106#c25 --- Comment #25 from Kurt Garloff <garloff@novell.com> 2008-11-20 08:44:14 MST --- Created an attachment (id=253968) --> (https://bugzilla.novell.com/attachment.cgi?id=253968) hwclock-tryint.diff Just for completeness. Inclusion into SLE11 only after upstream feedback. This one is new: We don't use RTC_UIE as it can be broken on some machines. Using it would make our waiting for the hwclock much cheaper though. So try and use the busy waiting as fallback, so the attempt is non-fatal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441106 Dr. Werner Fink <werner@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #253958|text/x-diff |text/plain mime type| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441106 User mkoenig@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441106#c26 Matthias Koenig <mkoenig@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #26 from Matthias Koenig <mkoenig@novell.com> 2008-11-21 04:20:32 MST --- Patch from comment #20 submitted to STABLE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441106 User garloff@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441106#c27 --- Comment #27 from Kurt Garloff <garloff@novell.com> 2008-11-21 16:47:05 MST --- Thanks, Matthias, Werner! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441106 User hvogel@novell.com added comment https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441106#c29 Hendrik Vogelsang <hvogel@novell.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Info Provider| |garloff@novell.com --- Comment #29 from Hendrik Vogelsang <hvogel@novell.com> 2009-03-09 07:50:40 MST --- kurt whats the upstream status here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
participants (1)
-
bugzilla_noreply＠novell.com