https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441106
User mmeeks@novell.com added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441106#c2
Michael Meeks changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|INVALID |
--- Comment #2 from Michael Meeks 2008-11-05 21:11:46 MST ---
you might notices the synchronize method is C ;-) and thus part of hwclock. If
this is a hwclock issue - please do help by assigning it to the relevant
maintainer of util-linux [ I have no idea who that is ].
Wrt. getting the correct time; clearly that is a good idea. My question is -
how correct do we want to be ? to the microsecond ? or to the second ? how
accurate do you expect the mount time to be ?
Presumably the fact that the mount time can be in the past when NTP corrects a
badly wrong system clock must be handled too - so; really, I don't understand
your concerns.
So - again, do we need to wait 1.5 seconds as a result of boot.clock ? or can
we be somewhat less precise (perhaps just for the Desktop case), in order to
save 3% of our boot time ? ;-)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.