https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1226827 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1226827#c4 --- Comment #4 from nuts <rx2l5t+4zshakz4lenfc@sharklasers.com> --- (In reply to Jiri Wiesner from comment #3)
It there a specific use case (or a benchmark) that you are aware of, perhaps your own? We could work on addressing this use case before we start taking steps that change an option that potentially decreases throughput? On the other hand, Tumbleweed is not deployed on production servers of SUSE's customers so I think there is more leeway in terms of performance regressions.
I'm thinking of general desktop usage, gaming, and power efficiency, mostly. There should be improved response times in those cases and they *should* be more power efficient because the CPU enters an idle state faster, and there's a large gaming audience on Tumbleweed so far. According to the Ubuntu benchmarks I sent before, the nohz_full boot option could mitigate worse throughput, right? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.