Comment # 4 on bug 1226827 from nuts

(In reply to Jiri Wiesner from comment #3)
> It there a specific use case (or a benchmark) that you are aware of, perhaps
> your own? We could work on addressing this use case before we start taking
> steps that change an option that potentially decreases throughput? On the
> other hand, Tumbleweed is not deployed on production servers of SUSE's
> customers so I think there is more leeway in terms of performance
> regressions.

I'm thinking of general desktop usage, gaming, and power efficiency, mostly.
There should be improved response times in those cases and they *should* be
more power efficient because the CPU enters an idle state faster, and there's a
large gaming audience on Tumbleweed so far. According to the Ubuntu benchmarks
I sent before, the nohz_full boot option could mitigate worse throughput,
right?