https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851338
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851338#c41
--- Comment #41 from Jan Beulich
Okay, so what about my suggestion to do compatibility to the top-level Xen version (4.x)?
And what when the major version changes? That would become even more disruptive a change then.
Or provide pv-ops in the default kernel, and then a separate kernel-xen that is not pv-ops and does not contain all of the backward-compatibility?
This is being considered as an option independently of the issue here, but has its own problems.
Or provide a kernel-xen-compat package that has a kernel that is specifically backward-compatible?
That we already have - kernel-ec2. Just that it comes without any PCI pass-through support.
I respect that you have good reason for that, but can you make us a counter-offer that doesn't involve something like "Replace all of your existing XenServer infrastructure with Xen-based host XYZ?"
You may not like to hear this, but - use SLES instead of openSUSE? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.