https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173226 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173226#c8 --- Comment #8 from Michael Chang <mchang@suse.com> --- (In reply to Ludwig Nussel from comment #2)
What if we make grub2-install know about secure boot itself and call shim-install if needed? That way tools like kiwi or pbl would only need to know efi? grub? -> grub2-install. Whether or not to do something with shim is up to grub2-install then.
To begin with I'd like to clarify this question first: Which one makes more sense: grub requires shim or shim requires grub ? For one I still think it makes more sense for shim to require grub as it explicitly hardcoded grub.efi execution in its source and therefore could be treated as addons to grub's boot stack to achieve the Microsoft Windows logo enablement for grub. If grub has to call or use shim stuff then the dependency would go reversed, or we may bump into loop dependency. If my memory serves well Raymund used to share his mind about the dependency has to go "grub requires shim" but I couldn't recall the details. Raymund would you please comment if you have anything to add here? :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.