https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=213982 pbaudis@novell.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pbaudis@novell.com AssignedTo|pbaudis@novell.com |kernel-maintainers@forge.provo.novell.com ------- Comment #2 from pbaudis@novell.com 2006-10-20 16:10 MST ------- Funnily enough, this topic was mentioned today on #lsb (Jiri, if you're using IRC, it might be interesting for you to hang there BTW, since you're doing the conformance testing): [23:50] < licquia> basically, the lsb tests mmap() three consecutive pages from a large file, and then munmap() the middle page [23:51] < licquia> then they try to msync() the first two pages [23:51] < licquia> that should fail, but on kernels 2.6.17 and higher, it succeeds [23:52] < pasky> I see. How grave is it a problem for LSB certification? Do the distributions need to fix that? Or will LSB be "fixed" not to mandate that? [23:52] < licquia> that's what i'm trying to figure out [23:52] < licquia> right now, it's looking like a kernel problem [23:52] < licquia> after some investigation, i've found evidence that it's fixed in 2.6.19rc1 [23:52] < licquia> which i'm testing right now [23:53] < licquia> (if i can get a kernel built that supports sata :-) ) [23:53] < licquia> what clued us in is that red hat backported the patch to their 2.6.18 kernel [23:54] < licquia> and fedora core w/ that kernel passes the test http://kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-2.6.17.y.git;a=commit... broke it. http://kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=... fixed it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.