http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=908624
Johannes Meixner changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|okular: printing of certain |pdftk 2.02: printing of
|PDF files does not work |certain PDF files cannot
|(works via "lpr" command) |work with "fit-to-page"
| |(wrong BoundingBox values)
--- Comment #10 from Johannes Meixner ---
I think the DSC values are not correct in print-job-data_132.save.
print-job-data_132.save contains
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%%BoundingBox: 0 0 595 842
%%PageBoundingBox: 0 0 311 542
%%PageBoundingBox: 0 0 317 548
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ghostscript shows the actual BoundingBox values for the two pages:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# gs -sDEVICE=bbox -dBATCH -dNOPAUSE print-job-data_132.save
%%BoundingBox: 142 149 453 692
%%BoundingBox: 138 147 456 695
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
When I change the BoundingBox values in print-job-data_132.save
as follows:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%%BoundingBox: 138 147 456 695
%%PageBoundingBox: 142 149 453 692
%%PageBoundingBox: 138 147 456 695
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
then the CUPS printing option fit-to-page works for this file.
I.e. the BoundingBox values in the PostScript are wrong.
The PostScript is created by pdftk:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# grep Creator print-job-data*save
print-job-data_131.save:%%Creator: pdftk 2.02 - www.pdftk.com
print-job-data_132.save:%%Creator: pdftk 2.02 - www.pdftk.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
According to my analysis it means:
Printing of certain PDF files does not work with "fit-to-page"
because of wrong BoundingBox values in the PostScript
that is created by "pdftk 2.02".
Therefore it seems to be a bug in "pdftk 2.02" (or in whatever
helper-tool or library that is used by pdftk to crate PostScript).
Stefan Brandner,
I think you should submit a new bug report for pdftk.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
