https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1192011 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1192011#c3 Raymund Will <rw@suse.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jlee@suse.com, | |rjschwei@suse.com, | |rw@suse.com Flags| |needinfo?(rjschwei@suse.com | |) --- Comment #3 from Raymund Will <rw@suse.com> --- From my PoV this issue can be solved in two ways: #1 change `shim` to require the proper grub-platform for the architecture it is built for and not the generic `grub2-efi` (which was IMHO obsoleted by the noarch-move in FATE#326960). This may take a considerable amount of time, depending on whether repackaging of `shim` will require a new M$ signature or not. #2 amend the image definition, that pulls in `shim`, to also request the grub2-platform package (`grub2-x86_64-efi` in this case), to avoid the BS ambiguity. Robert, would #2 be a viable option? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.